Seek Financial Advice Not An Accomplice

Financial Advice or Financial Accomplice?
There is a very important question you need to ask yourself when you visit with a financial adviser — are you seeking advice? Of course, you may say. But many times you are not really looking for financial advice but a financial accomplice. Sounds complex? Let us try to understand this. When I visit a financial adviser, is it because I have a few ideas, have I made some decisions that I want the financial adviser to endorse, or is it because I go with an open mind and ask him for his competent financial advice under the given circumstances? More often than not, it happens to be the first situation, maybe subconsciously.

Let me explain with an example. An engineer meets with a financial planner with his wife looking for financial advice. He is ready with his tax returns and shows how he has smartly invested $100,000 in CDs earning him 5% interest at that time. His mortgage interest was less than 4% and he was saving tax on mortgage interest too. So he was under the impression that he was making thousands of dollars every year. Great, indeed!

The financial adviser explained to him that firstly, the interest he earned on CDs was actually causing taxes on his Social Security. If this component were taken away then the taxes on Social Security would go away too. These additional taxes paid on Social Security were more than the money he was making on his mortgage interest. Secondly, he thought he was getting a lot of tax deductions on his mortgage interest but in reality he was getting only about $1000 because the standard deduction was covering most of his deductions. So, he did not even get the deduction he assumed he was getting. The sound financial advice given to him was to pay off his mortgage.

Did he listen to this financial advice? No. He was not really looking for advice. He wanted to show his wife how smart he was in front of a financial advisor, but he ended up doing the opposite. He just wanted an accomplice.

So, when you go out seeking financial advice, consciously seek advice. Do not go with biases, closed minds, or any agendas in place. They will put blinkers on your mind and filter out any sound advice given to you. Do not go out looking for accomplices for your ideas. Only good financial advice can lead to sound financial prudence.

Seek advice not an accomplice!

Dallas Financial Advisor – Myths Part 8 – Investing on Diversified Portfolio of Mutual Funds

Dallas Registered Investment Advisor – Myths Part 8

Myth number 8, according to Wall Street Journal writer Brett Arends, occurs when you hear your investment advisor say, “We recommend a diversified portfolio of mutual funds.”

If your broker means you should diversify across things like cash, bonds, stocks, alternative strategies, commodities and precious metals, then that’s good advice.

But too many brokers mean mutual funds with different names and “styles” like large-cap value, small-cap growth, midcap blend, international small-cap value, and so on. These are marketing gimmicks. There is, for example, no such thing as “midcap blend.” These funds are typically 100% invested all the time, and all in stocks. In this global economy even “international” offers less diversification than it did, because everything’s getting tied together.

I’m largely with Arends with this one.  I’m on board with diversification, of course, although I differ when he gets to precious metals.  I’ve got clients in portfolios that contain companies that mine precious metals, companies that sell precious metals, that sort of thing.  I don’t have any portfolios that actually contain the metals themselves.

I’m big on diversifying across a number of asset classes – and alternative strategies can be a big part of that.  I use real estate, leasing companies, all sorts of alternative strategies, if that’s what is needed for a client’s portfolio.  I’m not as keen on commodities, because the volatility is so extreme.  I’ve got some commodity portfolios for some of my biggest customers – those with a couple million and above.  Those are very volatile, very risky investments.  But for some customers, to properly diversify their portfolios, you look for creative places to put money.  I’ve found some commodity-based investments that make sense.

He’s got a good point about the global economy.  AT&T is in large-cap funds, you’ll find it in a blend, and because it’s an international company, you’ll find it in an international fund.  So the challenge is determining what an asset really is.  The good news is that in my firm, we don’t use mutual funds in the way the rest of the market uses them.  Our ‘funds’ are built completely differently than the way the rest of the market builds them.  Ours are not actively managed, which holds down the internal costs.

When you want to build a portfolio, you want a broadly-based portfolio with stocks, low-risk fixed income investments (5 years or less), with a tilt toward value equities and small international equities.  Build it as broadly as you can, as cheaply as you can, controlling costs and maximizing returns.  I’m rebalancing my funds on a daily basis, and I’m recommending my clients rebalance their portfolios quarterly.  Then you can build in your alternative strategies to manage risk and optimize returns.  Creating a comfortable retirement using a diversified portfolio is no mystery, and its no myth.

Dallas Financial Advisor – Myth Part 7: Investing by Market Timing

Dallas Financial Plans – Myths Part 7

Time to tackle myth number 7:  “You can’t time the market.”

This hoary old chestnut keeps the clients fully invested. Certainly it’s a fool’s errand to try to catch the market’s twists and turns. But that doesn’t mean you have to suspend judgment about overall valuations.

If you invest in shares when they’re cheap compared to cash flows and assets — typically this happens when everyone else is gloomy — you will usually do very well.

If you invest when shares are very expensive — such as when everyone else is absurdly bullish — you will probably do badly.

‘This hoary old chestnut’?   Who talks like that?  Maybe it’s a journalist thing.

Let me be clear.  You can’t time the market.  It’s not a myth.

What Brett Arends is talking about here is value investing.  You want to own what’s going up, and not own what’s going to drop.  But nobody knows what’s going to happen in the future.  The right way to add equities to a portfolio is watching things like book-to-market formulas.  Our portfolios are tilted slightly toward value equities.

My problem with Brett is that he’s encouraging the bad habit of market timing.  Brett wants you to look into your crystal ball and guess which stocks are cheap and which are overpriced.  No one can truly tell you that – not even the employees running the company.  All you have to do is watch time-tested metrics for value and rebalance a portfolio to tilt it towards the value proposition you need.  New stocks become value stocks on a day-to-day basis.

AIG used to be a growth stock – it was in my growth portfolio.  Now it’s probably a value stock – it’s got a high book-to-market.  You can’t time the market, but you can build a portfolio that tilts towards value.  That will give you an edge over a simple buy-and-hold portfolio.

Financial Advisor – Frame Blindness – Get Rid of Debt

Retirement Plan Consultants – Get Rid of Debt

My team of retirement plan consultants routinely pushes against weaknesses in our clients’ understanding of investing.  One way to describe it is frame blindness.  What’s that?  “Frame Blindness” – Setting out to solve the wrong problem because you have created a mental framework for your decision, with little thought, that causes you to overlook the best options or lose sight of important objectives.

I see a lot of people in my office who need help from retirement plan consultants who are probably suffering from Frame Blindness.  Here’s an example.  One of my clients received a $200,000 inheritance, and wanted to know how to invest it.  My first question was to learn if he had any consumer debt.  He replied that he didn’t have any debt.  I inquired about car loans.  “Nope, I’m debt-free”, he told me.  I asked him if he still made mortgage payments.  “Well, yes, I have $100,000 left to pay off on my mortgage.”

It doesn’t take a roomful of retirement plan consultants to figure out that’s debt!  Just because it’s low-interest debt, it’s still debt.  I immediately recommend he take half of his inheritance and pay off his house, immediately increasing his cash flow.  Then I recommended he put the other half of the money in the market.  With his house paid off, he could afford to take a little more risk with the remaining investment capital, earning better returns in the long term.

He didn’t take the advice of my retirement plan consultants, and I’m convinced that the reason was that he was a victim of frame blindness.  He had already created a mental framework of investing $200,000 in the market, and just couldn’t visualize paying off his house with some of the money.  It just didn’t fit into the frame of mind he had created.  He wanted to roll the dice and gamble the whole 200 grand.  When he came to my office, did he really want impartial, expert financial advice?  No, I don’t think so.  I think he wanted somebody to confirm the thought that he already had in his head.

This is an unfortunate story enough on its own, but to make it worse, this all happened in early 2007.  Starting in mid-2007, the market started into a year-and-a-half-long slump.  I don’t know what happened for sure, but I can only guess that this man put all his money into the market just before the crash.  I shudder to think he had to watch half or more of his investments disappear.

Don’t let this happen to you.  Don’t let briefly-considered thoughts create a mindset that prevents you from hearing and acting on good advice from retirement plan consultants who have your best interests at heart.  Don’t close off options just because you hadn’t thought of them before.  Keep an open mind, and you can fight off the portfolio-killing effects of frame blindness.